<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">something about " Facebook famous" ==>> they have no social life<br>β jimmy nathan fulford (@Jimmyfulford) <a href="https://twitter.com/Jimmyfulford/status/327879801966833667">April 26, 2013</a></blockquote><br><strong>Me:</strong><br>isn't that a contradiction?<br><strong>@Jimmyfulford</strong><br>well i mean, real social life in the real world<br><strong>Me:</strong><br>social media is part of the real world. Data and interaction by real people<br>not sure where the misconception comes that Internet communication is somehow less than other methods<br><strong>@Jimmyfulford</strong><br>i understand about all that smart fact you told me , i just, dont agree with you,even when it's a fact :)<br><strong>Me:</strong><br>well, that's absurd..<br>it's also ironic that your opinion is not real. lol<br><strong>@Jimmyfulford</strong><br>u know what absurd is?when ppl have 5000friends on FB,but none in real life<br>social media is part of the real world?yea,but actually it's not real,it's called 'hyperreality',u might want to read it first<br><strong>Me:</strong><br>hyper is a prefix. Still reality is the root. .<br>Internet social connections are real. You could argue that Internet is more limited than in person. . But both equally real<br><strong>@Jimmyfulford</strong><br>lmao what an excuse, u smart,but not that smart. and you clearly need to read some Baudrillard<br>both equally real? thats the most stupid thing i've heard lmao<br>not about to brag but, believe me i know more than you know. n im not in the mood to argue,so, cheers<br><strong>Me:</strong><br>that's extremely arrogant of you. Good luck